Baggio talks about providing useful visuals that the learner can use to help them better understand the material being taught. That adult learning is different from kid learning because adults ask why questions. Adults want to know the end product and what benefit they can gain from learning the information. Kids just do what the teachers ask and most of the time don’t ask why questions or what they can gain from learning the information. Kids just assume that’s how it has to be and do what they are told even if they can’t relate or comprehend the material. Baggio suggests that teachers should be the facilitators and must teach with their student’s perspective in mind. Teachers must find useful visual that students can access to help them better understand the material. Dervin also talks about teaching with the seekers perspective in mind. As the teacher we are the user or the help we give our students the seekers the tools to overcome the gap, or the unknown information. We have to teach our students to ask why questions to ask what benefit they will gain from learning this new information. So I guess what I learned from both authors was to keep my student’s perspective in mind and help my students understand the information and understand why they need to understand it. I have to make sure I don’t just teach to the test, but rather the big picture of why do my students need to learn the information and what can I do to facilitate their learning.
0 Comments
My innovative learning journey has been an eye opening experience. I have been teaching for 4 years and with each year of experience I gain I am adding new tools to my belt. Starting this program I had no idea what I new tools I would gain, but so far I am adding a whole new way of looking at how I teach. I am learning how to think outside the box and teach my lessons based on how my students are understanding them and not based on the fact that we have to finish the lesson to keep up the pace and finish according to our pacing guide. I find it especially difficult to slow down during math. I have to stay on pace or I will "fall behind" and the students will not be ready for the upcoming test. I have found my self teaching to the test to make sure they have a passing score on their math test. This course has pushed my thinking and has assured me that I can slow down and have the students learning process and questions to guide my teaching not so much keeping up with the pacing guide.
After reading Dervin's "Sense making The Mind's Eye", a second time it became a bit clearer. I was able to relate to two quotes from Dervin's article first, "that human use of information and information systems needs to be studied from the perspective of the actor, not from the perspective of the observer"; second, "the approach attempts to provide a vehicle for giving voices to users and potential users of systems so that the systems can be responsive to them" These two struck me because I can relate them to my students. My students are the seekers, the curriculum is the gap, and the use is me, the teacher. I have to develop my lessons with my students perspectives in mind, not my own. I usually prepare my lessons by looking at the teacher edition and taking a look at the standards and where they have to be at the end of the lesson. I am now finding myself questioning why I am doing that. I am starting to understand that as the teacher I should facilitate my student's learning and have their questions guide my teaching. I need to provide the best learning environment and let them problem solve as a team. Let them know that if they don't get it right the first time it's ok, making mistakes is part of learning. "By using powerful visual images to impact the way people learn, you can increase the probability that the learner will learn. By positioning him or her in the learning zone, a place that takes into account where the learner is and what we know about learning, you will have created an environment that supports the individual's ability to learn" (Baggio p.9). If I can connect Dervin and Baggio I would have to say that Dervin talks about taking the seekers' perspective and ask questions about how they would like to be helped; Baggio talks about providing the best learning environment and useful visuals for the seeker so that they can increase their probability to learn. Overall my learning experience in this program has forced me to take a close look at my teaching and have the courage to change my teaching if it's not working for my students. It's giving me so many tools already and can't wait to keep learning even more to help my students succeed. The only way I could make sense of it was to take notes. When I write down my thoughts and what I understad then it starts to make sense. This was a hard article to read and understand; with that said what I understood was that sense making is how an individual reacts during a specific event in time . That same individual may have a different reaction at a different time or if circumstances change. The overall theme I got was that communication was key between people and cultures. That communication changes as people live through different experiences. Dervin states "Some judge a moment by use of a standard, others judge by familiarity or comfort". Thus people form assumptions about the information and may miss inform due to it.
If I were to teach this to high school kids I am not sure how I would teach it, this was hard for me to understand. I would definetly have to break the material into 2 parts and have them work in partners to come up with the same situations but variations to what happens to individuals. Then I would have students compare how communication would change depending on the variation each individual experiences. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
May 2018
Categories |